[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0e203a18049712173818f404b4a32163@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 18:03:31 +0530
From: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>
To: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 0/2] soc: qcom: llcc: Support chipsets that can write to
llcc regs
Hi Bjorn,
On 2020-09-15 12:25, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
> Older chipsets may not be allowed to configure certain LLCC registers
> as that is handled by the secure side software. However, this is not
> the case for newer chipsets and they must configure these registers
> according to the contents of the SCT table, while keeping in mind that
> older targets may not have these capabilities. So add support to allow
> such configuration of registers to enable capacity based allocation
> and power collapse retention for capable chipsets.
>
> Reason for choosing capacity based allocation rather than the default
> way based allocation is because capacity based allocation allows more
> finer grain partition and provides more flexibility in configuration.
> As for the retention through power collapse, it has an advantage where
> the cache hits are more when we wake up from power collapse although
> it does burn more power but the exact power numbers are not known at
> the moment.
>
Gentle ping!
Thanks,
Sai
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
Powered by blists - more mailing lists