linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 7/7] gpio: exar: use devm action for freeing the IDA and drop remove()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 26 Oct 2020 17:03:43 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc:     Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] gpio: exar: use devm action for freeing the IDA and
 drop remove()

On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 4:22 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
>
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
>
> We can simplify the error path in probe() and drop remove() entirely if
> we provide a devm action for freeing the device ID.

Always the same question to IDR/IDA users:
does it guarantee that when the driver is gone the IDR/IDA resources are freed?

(It's not directly related to this patch, though)

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko