[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=MekeB=ik_+J7e7U9wicdaHG7PPdMDtP=X8hBQRRrrOE7A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 16:12:17 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] gpio: exar: use devm action for freeing the IDA and
drop remove()
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 4:02 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 4:22 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
> >
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> >
> > We can simplify the error path in probe() and drop remove() entirely if
> > we provide a devm action for freeing the device ID.
>
> Always the same question to IDR/IDA users:
> does it guarantee that when the driver is gone the IDR/IDA resources are freed?
>
> (It's not directly related to this patch, though)
>
Yes because there's exactly one ida_free(id) per id = ida_alloc() here.
Bartosz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists