[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5hk0vd3tc3.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 16:22:36 +0100
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable-commits@...r.kernel.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Subject: Re: Patch "ASoC: topology: disable size checks for bytes_ext controls if needed" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 16:01:09 +0100,
Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/26/20 7:11 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 01:53:46AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> >> This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
> >>
> >> ASoC: topology: disable size checks for bytes_ext controls if needed
> >>
> >> to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
> >> http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
> >>
> >> The filename of the patch is:
> >> asoc-topology-disable-size-checks-for-bytes_ext-cont.patch
> >> and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
> >>
> >> If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
> >> please let <stable@...r.kernel.org> know about it.
> >>
> >
> > This breaks the build, so I'm dropping it from everywhere it had
> > problems.
> >
> > Also, why 5.4.y and not 4.19.y, but 4.14.y and 4.9.y?
>
> Ah yes, there's a missed dependency on
> fbd3eb7f66c5b ('ALSA: control: Add verification for kctl accesses')
>
> I thought all of this was 20 years old but that commit added the
> option SND_CTL_VALIDATION which exposed the problem with this topology
> patch. Given the date (January 2020), I don't think it makes sense
> before 5.6?
>
> I don't think this could have compiled prior to 5.6, I e.g. checked on
> 4.14.202 and the define SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_ACCESS_SKIP_CHECK was not
> defined either.
>
> git grep SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_ACCESS_SKIP_CHECK
> sound/soc/soc-topology.c: k->access |=
> SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_ACCESS_SKIP_CHECK;
>
> Summary: I suggested this patch be dropped for all versions that don't
> contain fbd3eb7f66c5b. Takashi, do you concur?
Yes, correct.
thanks,
Takashi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists