[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <160f3f542a89e0263d5d375fdae796af6017c33c.camel@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 17:26:17 +0100
From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@....net>,
linux-input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
linux-rpi-kernel <linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] firmware: raspberrypi: Introduce
rpi_firmware_put()
On Thu, 2020-10-22 at 21:46 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 9:06 PM Nicolas Saenz Julienne
> <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de> wrote:
> > When unbinding the firmware device we need to make sure it has no
> > consumers left. Otherwise we'd leave them with a firmware handle
> > pointing at freed memory.
> >
> > Keep a reference count of all consumers and make sure they all finished
> > unbinding before we do.
>
> Wait, if it's a device, why do we need all these?
> get_device() / put_device() along with module_get() / module_put()
> should be sufficient, no?
Could you expand here a little, I do see how I could use get_device()'s
reference count. But it seems to me I'd be digging way too deep into kobj in
order to get the functionality I need.
If you meant to say that it should be automatically taken care by the platform
bus, just FYI we're using 'simple-mfd' in DT. Where firmware supplier is the
parent and all consumers are children.
Regards,
Nicolas
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists