linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] tty: serial: imx: remove unneeded break

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201026163247.q4bmvrifrdbtgsia@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Mon, 26 Oct 2020 17:32:47 +0100
From:   Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:     trix@...hat.com
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jirislaby@...nel.org,
        shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de,
        festevam@...il.com, linux-imx@....com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tty: serial: imx: remove unneeded break

Hello,

On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 06:07:09AM -0700, trix@...hat.com wrote:
> From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
> 
> A break is not needed if it is preceded by a return
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>

Just for the record: I commented for v1:

> this might be subjective, but I like the break being there for clearity.
> So I object to make a patch to remove them. In case I'm outvoted I'd at
> least want empty lines instead.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)