lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOwMV_w5N0_Qgg3MFph1147cbvFP1Y=mUtNjGbcr-Tca4ZJ3yA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 26 Oct 2020 18:18:35 +0100
From:   Fabien Parent <fparent@...libre.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, lgirdwood@...il.com,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: regulator: add support for MT6392

Hi Mark,

On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 1:13 PM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 10:03:03PM +0200, Fabien Parent wrote:
>
> > +Required properties:
> > +- compatible: "mediatek,mt6392-regulator"
>
> This is no longer used by the driver, should be unneeded and therefore
> should be removed.

It is not used by the driver but it will be used by the MFD driver [0]
like this:
static const struct mfd_cell mt6392_devs[] = {
    {
        [snip]
    }, {
        [snip]
    }, {
        .name = "mt6392-regulator",
        .of_compatible = "mediatek,mt6392-regulator"
    }, {
        [snip]
    },
};

[0] drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c

>
> > +- mt6392regulator: List of regulators provided by this controller. It is named
>
> This property doesn't seem to appear anywhere - there's regulators, the
> collection of subnodes for each individual regulator which I think is
> what is referenced here, but nothing called mt6392regulator.

Indeed, I will fix it in the next rev.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ