[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e6cd6eecb0221742548e657faf211733@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:43:16 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: "Biwen Li (OSS)" <biwen.li@....nxp.com>
Cc: linux@...musvillemoes.dk, shawnguo@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>,
"Z.q. Hou" <zhiqiang.hou@....com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
jason@...edaemon.net, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiafei Pan <jiafei.pan@....com>,
Xiaobo Xie <xiaobo.xie@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [v2 01/11] irqchip: ls-extirq: Add LS1043A, LS1088A external
interrupt
On 2020-10-27 10:35, Biwen Li (OSS) wrote:
>>
>> On 2020-10-27 04:46, Biwen Li wrote:
>> > From: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@....com>
>> >
>> > Add an new IRQ chip declaration for LS1043A and LS1088A
>> > - compatible "fsl,ls1043a-extirq" for LS1043A, LS1046A.
>> > SCFG_INTPCR[31:0]
>> > of these SoCs is stored/read as SCFG_INTPCR[0:31] defaultly(bit
>> > reverse)
>> > - compatible "fsl,ls1088a-extirq" for LS1088A, LS208xA, LX216xA
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@....com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Biwen Li <biwen.li@....com>
>>
>> You clearly couldn't be bothered to read what I wrote in my earlier
>> replies. I'm
>> thus ignoring this series...
> Okay, got it.
>>
>> > ---
>> > Change in v2:
>> > - add despcription of bit reverse
>> > - update copyright
>> >
>> > drivers/irqchip/irq-ls-extirq.c | 10 +++++++++-
>> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-ls-extirq.c
>> > b/drivers/irqchip/irq-ls-extirq.c index 4d1179fed77c..9587bc2607fc
>> > 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-ls-extirq.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-ls-extirq.c
>> > @@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
>> > // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> > -
>> > +/*
>> > + * Author: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
>> > + * Copyright 2020 NXP
>>
>> ... specially when you keep attributing someone else's copyright to
>> NXP.
> Then I don't know how to add the copyright, any suggestions?
Simple. You don't add anything. NXP's copyright doesn't apply to this
file before this patch, and your changes are so trivial that they don't
really warrant a mention. Furthermore, the git history already keeps
track
of who did what.
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists