[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201027110611.5hvuhsp3sjtcshsl@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 12:06:11 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] v5.9.1-rt19
On 2020-10-27 11:34:11 [+0100], Daniel Wagner wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 11:28:51AM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > Is it running as a RT task?
>
> root@c2d:~/rt-tests# ./pi_stress
> Starting PI Stress Test
> Number of thread groups: 1
> Duration of test run: infinite
> Number of inversions per group: unlimited
> Admin thread SCHED_FIFO priority 4
> 1 groups of 3 threads will be created
> High thread SCHED_FIFO priority 3
> Med thread SCHED_FIFO priority 2
> Low thread SCHED_FIFO priority 1
>
> It says so, let me double check if those task really run with SCHED_FIFO.
urgh. You wrote pi_stress and I read stress-ng. Okay this explains it.
> > Otherwise it looks that if you throw enough non-RT load on the system,
> > RCU can not catch up which does not sound good.
>
> I think this is what Clark tried to tell me. If I understood him
> correctly the test tool is not correct though.
a dummy RCU section might help. But otherwise it is correct :/
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists