linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 13/29] arm64/build: Assert for unwanted sections

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:23:16 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Cc:     Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
        Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 13/29] arm64/build: Assert for unwanted sections

On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 at 17:00, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 at 11:20, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jean-Philippe,
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 11:09 AM Jean-Philippe Brucker
> > <jean-philippe@...aro.org> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 06:38:46PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > > > > > Note that even on plain be2881824ae9eb92, I get:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >     aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: Unexpected GOT/PLT entries detected!
> > > > > > >     aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: Unexpected run-time procedure linkages detected!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The parent commit obviously doesn't show that (but probably still has
> > > > > > > the problem).
> > > > >
> > > > > Reverting both
> > > > > b3e5d80d0c48c0cc ("arm64/build: Warn on orphan section placement")
> > > > > be2881824ae9eb92 ("arm64/build: Assert for unwanted sections")
> > > > > seems to solve my problems, without any ill effects?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I cannot reproduce the issue here with my distro GCC+binutils (Debian 8.3.0)
> > >
> > > I have the same problem with one of my debug configs and Linux v5.10-rc1,
> > > and can reproduce with the Debian 8.3.0 toolchain, by using the arm64
> > > defconfig and disabling CONFIG_MODULES:
> > >
> > > ld -EL -maarch64elf --no-undefined -X -z norelro -shared -Bsymbolic -z notext --no-apply-dynamic-relocs --fix-cortex-a53-843419 --orphan-handling=warn --build-id=sha1 --strip-debug -o .tmp_vmlinux.kallsyms1 -T ./arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds --whole-archive arch/arm64/kernel/head.o init/built-in.a usr/built-in.a arch/arm64/built-in.a kernel/built-in.a certs/built-in.a mm/built-in.a fs/built-in.a ipc/built-in.a security/built-in.a crypto/built-in.a block/built-in.a arch/arm64/lib/built-in.a lib/built-in.a drivers/built-in.a sound/built-in.a net/built-in.a virt/built-in.a --no-whole-archive --start-group arch/arm64/lib/lib.a lib/lib.a ./drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/lib.a --end-group
> > > ld: Unexpected GOT/PLT entries detected!
> > > ld: Unexpected run-time procedure linkages detected!

 ld: Unexpected GOT/PLT entries detected!
 ld: Unexpected run-time procedure linkages detected!

The arm64 build error fixed by (I have tested defconfig)

[PATCH] soc: qcom: QCOM_RPMH fix build with modular QCOM_RPMH
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20201027111422.4008114-1-anders.roxell@linaro.org/
---

When building allmodconfig leading to the following link error with
CONFIG_QCOM_RPMH=y and CONFIG_QCOM_COMMAND_DB=m:

aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.o: in function `clk_rpmh_probe':
  drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c:474: undefined reference to `cmd_db_read_addr'
  drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c:474:(.text+0x254): relocation truncated
to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 against undefined symbol `cmd_db_read_addr'

Fix this by adding a Kconfig depenency and forcing QCOM_RPMH to be a
module when QCOM_COMMAND_DB is a module. Also removing the dependency on
'ARCH_QCOM || COMPILE_TEST' since that is already a dependency for
QCOM_COMMAND_DB.

Fixes: 778279f4f5e4 ("soc: qcom: cmd-db: allow loading as a module")
Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig
index 9b4ae9c16ba7..3bdd1604f78f 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ config QCOM_RMTFS_MEM

 config QCOM_RPMH
  tristate "Qualcomm RPM-Hardened (RPMH) Communication"
- depends on ARCH_QCOM || COMPILE_TEST
+ depends on QCOM_COMMAND_DB
  help
   Support for communication with the hardened-RPM blocks in
   Qualcomm Technologies Inc (QTI) SoCs. RPMH communication uses an
-- 
2.28.0


- Naresh