lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 13:03:35 +0100 (CET) From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr> To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de> cc: Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>, Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>, Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>, Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>, Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>, Sumera Priyadarsini <sylphrenadin@...il.com>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Cocci] Coccinelle: Checking the relevance of parentheses in “git grep” On Tue, 27 Oct 2020, Markus Elfring wrote: > >> … git grep -l -w \( -e for_each_node_by_type … -e for_each_node_with_property \) -- '*.c' > >> > >> > >> How do you think about to omit these parentheses here? > > > > Does it make a difference? > > I find that it can be nicer to avoid the passing of unnecessary characters. > > * The compilation of the affected OCaml source files can eventually benefit > from another bit of clean-up, can't it? I have no idea what this means. julia > * The called software components do also not need to fiddle with such extra data then. > > Regards, > Markus >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists