linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v3] usb: cdns3: Variable 'length' set but not used

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DM6PR07MB552997CD8216B5AFD522104CDD160@DM6PR07MB5529.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Oct 2020 12:08:25 +0000
From:   Pawel Laszczak <pawell@...ence.com>
To:     Peter Chen <peter.chen@....com>
CC:     "balbi@...nel.org" <balbi@...nel.org>,
        "rogerq@...com" <rogerq@...com>, "nsekhar@...com" <nsekhar@...com>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rahul Kumar <kurahul@...ence.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] usb: cdns3: Variable 'length' set but not used

Peter,

It looks like you missed the " [PATCH v3] usb: cdns3: Variable 'length' set but not used"

It's quite important because compiler complains for this when I use W=1.

Thanks,
Pawel

>> >
>> > A gentle ping.
>> >
>> > I assume that you should add this and the rest overdue cdsn3 patches
>> > as first to you ci-for-usb-next branch.
>> > Am I right?
>> >
>>
>> Hi Pawel,
>>
>> I queued them locally, and I waited for v5.10-rc1 which was out yesterday, then
>> I will apply them, and add cdns3 patches to my kernel.org branch. Will update
>> you these two days.
>>
>> Peter
>
>Hi Pawel,
>
>The cdns3 -next patches pushed to: for-usb-next; cdns3 -fixes patches pushed to: for-usb-fixes.
>The git is: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peter.chen/usb.git
>
>Currently, I only pushed three of your patches, would you please review my patches, thanks.
>
>Peter