[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201027135244.GM1822510@ulmo>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 14:52:44 +0100
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Mikko Perttunen <cyndis@...si.fi>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>,
Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@...il.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 32/52] memory: tegra20-emc: Continue probing if
timings are missing in device-tree
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 01:17:15AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> EMC driver will become mandatory after turning it into interconnect
> provider because interconnect users, like display controller driver, will
> fail to probe using newer device-trees that have interconnect properties.
> Thus make EMC driver to probe even if timings are missing in device-tree.
Does it really have to be mandatory? Sounds like that's going to make it
unnecessarily complicated to merge all of this. Is it complicated to
make interconnect support optional in consumer drivers?
Thierry
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists