linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.14 095/191] powerpc/tau: Use appropriate temperature sample interval

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20201027134914.264394230@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 27 Oct 2020 14:49:10 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>,
        Stan Johnson <userm57@...oo.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 095/191] powerpc/tau: Use appropriate temperature sample interval

From: Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>

[ Upstream commit 66943005cc41f48e4d05614e8f76c0ca1812f0fd ]

According to the MPC750 Users Manual, the SITV value in Thermal
Management Register 3 is 13 bits long. The present code calculates the
SITV value as 60 * 500 cycles. This would overflow to give 10 us on
a 500 MHz CPU rather than the intended 60 us. (But according to the
Microprocessor Datasheet, there is also a factor of 266 that has to be
applied to this value on certain parts i.e. speed sort above 266 MHz.)
Always use the maximum cycle count, as recommended by the Datasheet.

Fixes: 1da177e4c3f41 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
Tested-by: Stan Johnson <userm57@...oo.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/896f542e5f0f1d6cf8218524c2b67d79f3d69b3c.1599260540.git.fthain@telegraphics.com.au
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h |  2 +-
 arch/powerpc/kernel/tau_6xx.c  | 12 ++++--------
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
index 05f3c2b3aa0ec..d6be5781a97ce 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
@@ -753,7 +753,7 @@
 #define THRM1_TIN	(1 << 31)
 #define THRM1_TIV	(1 << 30)
 #define THRM1_THRES(x)	((x&0x7f)<<23)
-#define THRM3_SITV(x)	((x&0x3fff)<<1)
+#define THRM3_SITV(x)	((x & 0x1fff) << 1)
 #define THRM1_TID	(1<<2)
 #define THRM1_TIE	(1<<1)
 #define THRM1_V		(1<<0)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/tau_6xx.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/tau_6xx.c
index a3374e8a258c6..64a27b20cf55e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/tau_6xx.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/tau_6xx.c
@@ -175,15 +175,11 @@ static void tau_timeout(void * info)
 	 * complex sleep code needs to be added. One mtspr every time
 	 * tau_timeout is called is probably not a big deal.
 	 *
-	 * Enable thermal sensor and set up sample interval timer
-	 * need 20 us to do the compare.. until a nice 'cpu_speed' function
-	 * call is implemented, just assume a 500 mhz clock. It doesn't really
-	 * matter if we take too long for a compare since it's all interrupt
-	 * driven anyway.
-	 *
-	 * use a extra long time.. (60 us @ 500 mhz)
+	 * The "PowerPC 740 and PowerPC 750 Microprocessor Datasheet"
+	 * recommends that "the maximum value be set in THRM3 under all
+	 * conditions."
 	 */
-	mtspr(SPRN_THRM3, THRM3_SITV(500*60) | THRM3_E);
+	mtspr(SPRN_THRM3, THRM3_SITV(0x1fff) | THRM3_E);
 
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
 }
-- 
2.25.1