linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.8 090/633] sched/fair: Fix wrong cpu selecting from isolated domain

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20201027135526.923234414@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 27 Oct 2020 14:47:13 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Wetp Zhang <wetp.zy@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Xunlei Pang <xlpang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Jiang Biao <benbjiang@...cent.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.8 090/633] sched/fair: Fix wrong cpu selecting from isolated domain

From: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@...ux.alibaba.com>

[ Upstream commit df3cb4ea1fb63ff326488efd671ba3c39034255e ]

We've met problems that occasionally tasks with full cpumask
(e.g. by putting it into a cpuset or setting to full affinity)
were migrated to our isolated cpus in production environment.

After some analysis, we found that it is due to the current
select_idle_smt() not considering the sched_domain mask.

Steps to reproduce on my 31-CPU hyperthreads machine:
1. with boot parameter: "isolcpus=domain,2-31"
   (thread lists: 0,16 and 1,17)
2. cgcreate -g cpu:test; cgexec -g cpu:test "test_threads"
3. some threads will be migrated to the isolated cpu16~17.

Fix it by checking the valid domain mask in select_idle_smt().

Fixes: 10e2f1acd010 ("sched/core: Rewrite and improve select_idle_siblings())
Reported-by: Wetp Zhang <wetp.zy@...ux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Reviewed-by: Jiang Biao <benbjiang@...cent.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1600930127-76857-1-git-send-email-xlpang@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index f71e8b0e0346a..60c5a80f325b6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6067,7 +6067,7 @@ static int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int
 /*
  * Scan the local SMT mask for idle CPUs.
  */
-static int select_idle_smt(struct task_struct *p, int target)
+static int select_idle_smt(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
 {
 	int cpu;
 
@@ -6075,7 +6075,8 @@ static int select_idle_smt(struct task_struct *p, int target)
 		return -1;
 
 	for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_smt_mask(target)) {
-		if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, p->cpus_ptr))
+		if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, p->cpus_ptr) ||
+		    !cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, sched_domain_span(sd)))
 			continue;
 		if (available_idle_cpu(cpu) || sched_idle_cpu(cpu))
 			return cpu;
@@ -6091,7 +6092,7 @@ static inline int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *s
 	return -1;
 }
 
-static inline int select_idle_smt(struct task_struct *p, int target)
+static inline int select_idle_smt(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
 {
 	return -1;
 }
@@ -6266,7 +6267,7 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int prev, int target)
 	if ((unsigned)i < nr_cpumask_bits)
 		return i;
 
-	i = select_idle_smt(p, target);
+	i = select_idle_smt(p, sd, target);
 	if ((unsigned)i < nr_cpumask_bits)
 		return i;
 
-- 
2.25.1