[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5CF=KewxQm5jwXuwGDDeB1b_UqF4JZ5GqJpjV7LPR62zw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 20:59:34 -0300
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Guido Günther <agx@...xcpu.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.9 131/147] soc: imx: gpcv2: Use dev_err_probe()
to simplify error handling
Hi Sasha,
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 8:56 PM Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> From: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
>
> [ Upstream commit b663b798d04fb73f1ad4d54c46582d2fde7a76d6 ]
>
> dev_err_probe() can reduce code size, uniform error handling and record the
> defer probe reason etc., use it to simplify the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Guido Günther <agx@...xcpu.org>
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Does this qualify for stable since it is just a cleanup and not a bug fix?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists