[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201027135455.870200974@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 14:46:03 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.9 113/757] perf/x86: Fix n_pair for cancelled txn
[ Upstream commit 871a93b0aad65a7f44ee25f2d17932ef6d559850 ]
Kan reported that n_metric gets corrupted for cancelled transactions;
a similar issue exists for n_pair for AMD's Large Increment thing.
The problem was confirmed and confirmed fixed by Kim using:
sudo perf stat -e "{cycles,cycles,cycles,cycles}:D" -a sleep 10 &
# should succeed:
sudo perf stat -e "{fp_ret_sse_avx_ops.all}:D" -a workload
# should fail:
sudo perf stat -e "{fp_ret_sse_avx_ops.all,fp_ret_sse_avx_ops.all,cycles}:D" -a workload
# previously failed, now succeeds with this patch:
sudo perf stat -e "{fp_ret_sse_avx_ops.all}:D" -a workload
Fixes: 5738891229a2 ("perf/x86/amd: Add support for Large Increment per Cycle Events")
Reported-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Tested-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201005082516.GG2628@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
arch/x86/events/core.c | 6 +++++-
arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index 1cbf57dc2ac89..11bbc6590f904 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -1087,8 +1087,10 @@ static int collect_events(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *leader,
cpuc->event_list[n] = event;
n++;
- if (is_counter_pair(&event->hw))
+ if (is_counter_pair(&event->hw)) {
cpuc->n_pair++;
+ cpuc->n_txn_pair++;
+ }
}
return n;
}
@@ -1962,6 +1964,7 @@ static void x86_pmu_start_txn(struct pmu *pmu, unsigned int txn_flags)
perf_pmu_disable(pmu);
__this_cpu_write(cpu_hw_events.n_txn, 0);
+ __this_cpu_write(cpu_hw_events.n_txn_pair, 0);
}
/*
@@ -1987,6 +1990,7 @@ static void x86_pmu_cancel_txn(struct pmu *pmu)
*/
__this_cpu_sub(cpu_hw_events.n_added, __this_cpu_read(cpu_hw_events.n_txn));
__this_cpu_sub(cpu_hw_events.n_events, __this_cpu_read(cpu_hw_events.n_txn));
+ __this_cpu_sub(cpu_hw_events.n_pair, __this_cpu_read(cpu_hw_events.n_txn_pair));
perf_pmu_enable(pmu);
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
index 7b68ab5f19e76..0e74235cdac9e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
they've never been enabled yet */
int n_txn; /* the # last events in the below arrays;
added in the current transaction */
+ int n_txn_pair;
int assign[X86_PMC_IDX_MAX]; /* event to counter assignment */
u64 tags[X86_PMC_IDX_MAX];
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists