linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.9 220/757] samples/bpf: Fix to xdpsock to avoid recycling frames

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20201027135500.936862362@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 27 Oct 2020 14:47:50 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Weqaar Janjua <weqaar.a.janjua@...el.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.9 220/757] samples/bpf: Fix to xdpsock to avoid recycling frames

From: Weqaar Janjua <weqaar.a.janjua@...el.com>

[ Upstream commit b69e56cf765155dcac0037d7d0f162a2afab76c2 ]

The txpush program in the xdpsock sample application is supposed
to send out all packets in the umem in a round-robin fashion.
The problem is that it only cycled through the first BATCH_SIZE
worth of packets. Fixed this so that it cycles through all buffers
in the umem as intended.

Fixes: 248c7f9c0e21 ("samples/bpf: convert xdpsock to use libbpf for AF_XDP access")
Signed-off-by: Weqaar Janjua <weqaar.a.janjua@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200828161717.42705-1-weqaar.a.janjua@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c b/samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c
index 19c679456a0e2..c821e98671393 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c
@@ -1004,7 +1004,7 @@ static void rx_drop_all(void)
 	}
 }
 
-static void tx_only(struct xsk_socket_info *xsk, u32 frame_nb, int batch_size)
+static void tx_only(struct xsk_socket_info *xsk, u32 *frame_nb, int batch_size)
 {
 	u32 idx;
 	unsigned int i;
@@ -1017,14 +1017,14 @@ static void tx_only(struct xsk_socket_info *xsk, u32 frame_nb, int batch_size)
 	for (i = 0; i < batch_size; i++) {
 		struct xdp_desc *tx_desc = xsk_ring_prod__tx_desc(&xsk->tx,
 								  idx + i);
-		tx_desc->addr = (frame_nb + i) << XSK_UMEM__DEFAULT_FRAME_SHIFT;
+		tx_desc->addr = (*frame_nb + i) << XSK_UMEM__DEFAULT_FRAME_SHIFT;
 		tx_desc->len = PKT_SIZE;
 	}
 
 	xsk_ring_prod__submit(&xsk->tx, batch_size);
 	xsk->outstanding_tx += batch_size;
-	frame_nb += batch_size;
-	frame_nb %= NUM_FRAMES;
+	*frame_nb += batch_size;
+	*frame_nb %= NUM_FRAMES;
 	complete_tx_only(xsk, batch_size);
 }
 
@@ -1080,7 +1080,7 @@ static void tx_only_all(void)
 		}
 
 		for (i = 0; i < num_socks; i++)
-			tx_only(xsks[i], frame_nb[i], batch_size);
+			tx_only(xsks[i], &frame_nb[i], batch_size);
 
 		pkt_cnt += batch_size;
 
-- 
2.25.1