linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.9 550/757] ext4: fix dead loop in ext4_mb_new

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20201027135516.295126843@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 27 Oct 2020 14:53:20 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.9 550/757] ext4: fix dead loop in ext4_mb_new_blocks

From: Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>

[ Upstream commit 70022da804f0f3f152115688885608c39182082e ]

As we test disk offline/online with running fsstress, we find fsstress
process is keeping running state.
kworker/u32:3-262   [004] ...1   140.787471: ext4_mb_discard_preallocations: dev 8,32 needed 114
....
kworker/u32:3-262   [004] ...1   140.787471: ext4_mb_discard_preallocations: dev 8,32 needed 114

ext4_mb_new_blocks
repeat:
        ext4_mb_discard_preallocations_should_retry(sb, ac, &seq)
                freed = ext4_mb_discard_preallocations
                        ext4_mb_discard_group_preallocations
                                this_cpu_inc(discard_pa_seq);
                ---> freed == 0
                seq_retry = ext4_get_discard_pa_seq_sum
                        for_each_possible_cpu(__cpu)
                                __seq += per_cpu(discard_pa_seq, __cpu);
                if (seq_retry != *seq) {
                        *seq = seq_retry;
                        ret = true;
                }

As we see seq_retry is sum of discard_pa_seq every cpu, if
ext4_mb_discard_group_preallocations return zero discard_pa_seq in this
cpu maybe increase one, so condition "seq_retry != *seq" have always
been met.
Ritesh Harjani suggest to in ext4_mb_discard_group_preallocations function we
only increase discard_pa_seq when there is some PA to free.

Fixes: 07b5b8e1ac40 ("ext4: mballoc: introduce pcpu seqcnt for freeing PA to improve ENOSPC handling")
Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200916113859.1556397-3-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index 132c118d12e15..ff47347012f4b 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -4189,7 +4189,6 @@ ext4_mb_discard_group_preallocations(struct super_block *sb,
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&list);
 repeat:
 	ext4_lock_group(sb, group);
-	this_cpu_inc(discard_pa_seq);
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(pa, tmp,
 				&grp->bb_prealloc_list, pa_group_list) {
 		spin_lock(&pa->pa_lock);
@@ -4206,6 +4205,9 @@ ext4_mb_discard_group_preallocations(struct super_block *sb,
 		/* seems this one can be freed ... */
 		ext4_mb_mark_pa_deleted(sb, pa);
 
+		if (!free)
+			this_cpu_inc(discard_pa_seq);
+
 		/* we can trust pa_free ... */
 		free += pa->pa_free;
 
-- 
2.25.1