[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <685d850347a1191bba8ba7766fc409b140d18f03.camel@perches.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 09:50:36 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] vhost: vringh: use krealloc_array()
On Tue, 2020-10-27 at 11:28 -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 01:17:20PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> >
> > Use the helper that checks for overflows internally instead of manually
> > calculating the size of the new array.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
>
> No problem with the patch, it does introduce some symmetry in the code.
Perhaps more symmetry by using kmemdup
---
drivers/vhost/vringh.c | 23 ++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vringh.c b/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
index 8bd8b403f087..99222a3651cd 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
@@ -191,26 +191,23 @@ static int move_to_indirect(const struct vringh *vrh,
static int resize_iovec(struct vringh_kiov *iov, gfp_t gfp)
{
struct kvec *new;
- unsigned int flag, new_num = (iov->max_num & ~VRINGH_IOV_ALLOCATED) * 2;
+ size_t new_num = (iov->max_num & ~VRINGH_IOV_ALLOCATED) * 2;
+ size_t size;
if (new_num < 8)
new_num = 8;
- flag = (iov->max_num & VRINGH_IOV_ALLOCATED);
- if (flag)
- new = krealloc(iov->iov, new_num * sizeof(struct iovec), gfp);
- else {
- new = kmalloc_array(new_num, sizeof(struct iovec), gfp);
- if (new) {
- memcpy(new, iov->iov,
- iov->max_num * sizeof(struct iovec));
- flag = VRINGH_IOV_ALLOCATED;
- }
- }
+ if (unlikely(check_mul_overflow(new_num, sizeof(struct iovec), &size)))
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ if (iov->max_num & VRINGH_IOV_ALLOCATED)
+ new = krealloc(iov->iov, size, gfp);
+ else
+ new = kmemdup(iov->iov, size, gfp);
if (!new)
return -ENOMEM;
iov->iov = new;
- iov->max_num = (new_num | flag);
+ iov->max_num = new_num | VRINGH_IOV_ALLOCATED;
return 0;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists