[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201027135456.001781035@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 14:49:18 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 020/408] binder: fix UAF when releasing todo list
From: Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>
commit f3277cbfba763cd2826396521b9296de67cf1bbc upstream.
When releasing a thread todo list when tearing down
a binder_proc, the following race was possible which
could result in a use-after-free:
1. Thread 1: enter binder_release_work from binder_thread_release
2. Thread 2: binder_update_ref_for_handle() -> binder_dec_node_ilocked()
3. Thread 2: dec nodeA --> 0 (will free node)
4. Thread 1: ACQ inner_proc_lock
5. Thread 2: block on inner_proc_lock
6. Thread 1: dequeue work (BINDER_WORK_NODE, part of nodeA)
7. Thread 1: REL inner_proc_lock
8. Thread 2: ACQ inner_proc_lock
9. Thread 2: todo list cleanup, but work was already dequeued
10. Thread 2: free node
11. Thread 2: REL inner_proc_lock
12. Thread 1: deref w->type (UAF)
The problem was that for a BINDER_WORK_NODE, the binder_work element
must not be accessed after releasing the inner_proc_lock while
processing the todo list elements since another thread might be
handling a deref on the node containing the binder_work element
leading to the node being freed.
Signed-off-by: Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201009232455.4054810-1-tkjos@google.com
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 4.14, 4.19, 5.4, 5.8
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/android/binder.c | 35 ++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/android/binder.c
+++ b/drivers/android/binder.c
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ static struct binder_transaction_log_ent
struct binder_work {
struct list_head entry;
- enum {
+ enum binder_work_type {
BINDER_WORK_TRANSACTION = 1,
BINDER_WORK_TRANSACTION_COMPLETE,
BINDER_WORK_RETURN_ERROR,
@@ -889,27 +889,6 @@ static struct binder_work *binder_dequeu
return w;
}
-/**
- * binder_dequeue_work_head() - Dequeues the item at head of list
- * @proc: binder_proc associated with list
- * @list: list to dequeue head
- *
- * Removes the head of the list if there are items on the list
- *
- * Return: pointer dequeued binder_work, NULL if list was empty
- */
-static struct binder_work *binder_dequeue_work_head(
- struct binder_proc *proc,
- struct list_head *list)
-{
- struct binder_work *w;
-
- binder_inner_proc_lock(proc);
- w = binder_dequeue_work_head_ilocked(list);
- binder_inner_proc_unlock(proc);
- return w;
-}
-
static void
binder_defer_work(struct binder_proc *proc, enum binder_deferred_state defer);
static void binder_free_thread(struct binder_thread *thread);
@@ -4591,13 +4570,17 @@ static void binder_release_work(struct b
struct list_head *list)
{
struct binder_work *w;
+ enum binder_work_type wtype;
while (1) {
- w = binder_dequeue_work_head(proc, list);
+ binder_inner_proc_lock(proc);
+ w = binder_dequeue_work_head_ilocked(list);
+ wtype = w ? w->type : 0;
+ binder_inner_proc_unlock(proc);
if (!w)
return;
- switch (w->type) {
+ switch (wtype) {
case BINDER_WORK_TRANSACTION: {
struct binder_transaction *t;
@@ -4631,9 +4614,11 @@ static void binder_release_work(struct b
kfree(death);
binder_stats_deleted(BINDER_STAT_DEATH);
} break;
+ case BINDER_WORK_NODE:
+ break;
default:
pr_err("unexpected work type, %d, not freed\n",
- w->type);
+ wtype);
break;
}
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists