| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <d4d6ad8c-5add-f644-db76-4c74a9c4fd9e@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 14:55:25 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kselftest <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/21] selftests/resctrl: Rename CQM test as CMT test
On 10/20/20 5:51 PM, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> CMT (Cache Monitoring Technology) [1] is a H/W feature that reports cache
> occupancy of a process. resctrl selftest suite has a unit test to test CMT
> for LLC but the test is named as CQM (Cache Quality Monitoring).
> Furthermore, the unit test source file is named as cqm_test.c and several
> functions, variables, comments, preprocessors and statements widely use
> "cqm" as either suffix or prefix. This rampant misusage of CQM for CMT
> might confuse someone who is newly looking at resctrl selftests because
> this feature is named CMT in the Intel Software Developer's Manual.
>
> Hence, rename all the occurrences (unit test source file name, functions,
> variables, comments and preprocessors) of cqm with cmt.
>
> [1] Please see Intel SDM, Volume 3, chapter 17 and section 18 for more
> information on CMT.
Link please?
>
> Fixes: 78941183d1b1 ("selftests/resctrl: Add Cache QoS Monitoring (CQM) selftest")
Why is this a fix though? Quote the commit in the commit log and
please remove Fixes tag. No need to confuse tools that look for
Fixes tag to select patches for stables.
> Suggested-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/README | 4 +--
> tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cache.c | 4 +--
> .../resctrl/{cqm_test.c => cmt_test.c} | 20 +++++++-------
> tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h | 4 +--
> .../testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c | 26 +++++++++----------
> tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c | 12 ++++-----
> tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c | 10 +++----
> 7 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
> rename tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/{cqm_test.c => cmt_test.c} (89%)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/README b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/README
> index 6e5a0ffa18e8..4b36b25b6ac0 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/README
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/README
> @@ -46,8 +46,8 @@ ARGUMENTS
> Parameter '-h' shows usage information.
>
> usage: resctrl_tests [-h] [-b "benchmark_cmd [options]"] [-t test list] [-n no_of_bits]
> - -b benchmark_cmd [options]: run specified benchmark for MBM, MBA and CQM default benchmark is builtin fill_buf
> - -t test list: run tests specified in the test list, e.g. -t mbm, mba, cqm, cat
> + -b benchmark_cmd [options]: run specified benchmark for MBM, MBA and CMT default benchmark is builtin fill_buf
> + -t test list: run tests specified in the test list, e.g. -t mbm, mba, cmt, cat
> -n no_of_bits: run cache tests using specified no of bits in cache bit mask
> -p cpu_no: specify CPU number to run the test. 1 is default
> -h: help
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cache.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cache.c
> index 38dbf4962e33..4d73edd81293 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cache.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cache.c
> @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ static int get_llc_perf(unsigned long *llc_perf_miss)
>
> /*
> * Get LLC Occupancy as reported by RESCTRL FS
> - * For CQM,
> + * For CMT,
> * 1. If con_mon grp and mon grp given, then read from mon grp in
> * con_mon grp
> * 2. If only con_mon grp given, then read from con_mon grp
> @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ int measure_cache_vals(struct resctrl_val_param *param, int bm_pid)
> /*
> * Measure llc occupancy from resctrl.
> */
> - if (!strcmp(param->resctrl_val, "cqm")) {
> + if (!strcmp(param->resctrl_val, "cmt")) {
> ret = get_llc_occu_resctrl(&llc_occu_resc);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cqm_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c
> similarity index 89%
> rename from tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cqm_test.c
> rename to tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c
> index c8756152bd61..13b01e010238 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cqm_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> /*
> - * Cache Monitoring Technology (CQM) test
> + * Cache Monitoring Technology (CMT) test
> *
> * Copyright (C) 2018 Intel Corporation
> *
> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
> #include "resctrl.h"
> #include <unistd.h>
>
> -#define RESULT_FILE_NAME "result_cqm"
> +#define RESULT_FILE_NAME "result_cmt"
> #define NUM_OF_RUNS 5
> #define MAX_DIFF 2000000
> #define MAX_DIFF_PERCENT 15
> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ char cbm_mask[256];
> unsigned long long_mask;
> unsigned long cache_size;
>
> -static int cqm_setup(int num, ...)
> +static int cmt_setup(int num, ...)
> {
> struct resctrl_val_param *p;
> va_list param;
> @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static void show_cache_info(unsigned long sum_llc_occu_resc, int no_of_bits,
> else
> res = false;
>
> - printf("%sok CQM: diff within %d, %d\%%\n", res ? "" : "not",
> + printf("%sok CMT: diff within %d, %d\%%\n", res ? "" : "not",
> MAX_DIFF, (int)MAX_DIFF_PERCENT);
>
> printf("# diff: %ld\n", avg_diff);
> @@ -106,12 +106,12 @@ static int check_results(struct resctrl_val_param *param, int no_of_bits)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -void cqm_test_cleanup(void)
> +void cmt_test_cleanup(void)
> {
> remove(RESULT_FILE_NAME);
> }
>
> -int cqm_resctrl_val(int cpu_no, int n, char **benchmark_cmd)
> +int cmt_resctrl_val(int cpu_no, int n, char **benchmark_cmd)
> {
> int ret, mum_resctrlfs;
>
> @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ int cqm_resctrl_val(int cpu_no, int n, char **benchmark_cmd)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - if (!validate_resctrl_feature_request("cqm"))
> + if (!validate_resctrl_feature_request("cmt"))
> return -1;
>
> ret = get_cbm_mask("L3");
> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ int cqm_resctrl_val(int cpu_no, int n, char **benchmark_cmd)
> }
>
> struct resctrl_val_param param = {
> - .resctrl_val = "cqm",
> + .resctrl_val = "cmt",
> .ctrlgrp = "c1",
> .mongrp = "m1",
> .cpu_no = cpu_no,
> @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ int cqm_resctrl_val(int cpu_no, int n, char **benchmark_cmd)
> .mask = ~(long_mask << n) & long_mask,
> .span = cache_size * n / count_of_bits,
> .num_of_runs = 0,
> - .setup = cqm_setup,
> + .setup = cmt_setup,
> };
>
> if (strcmp(benchmark_cmd[0], "fill_buf") == 0)
> @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ int cqm_resctrl_val(int cpu_no, int n, char **benchmark_cmd)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - cqm_test_cleanup();
> + cmt_test_cleanup();
>
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h
> index 39bf59c6b9c5..68522b19b235 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h
> @@ -98,9 +98,9 @@ void ctrlc_handler(int signum, siginfo_t *info, void *ptr);
> int cat_val(struct resctrl_val_param *param);
> void cat_test_cleanup(void);
> int cat_perf_miss_val(int cpu_no, int no_of_bits, char *cache_type);
> -int cqm_resctrl_val(int cpu_no, int n, char **benchmark_cmd);
> +int cmt_resctrl_val(int cpu_no, int n, char **benchmark_cmd);
> unsigned int count_bits(unsigned long n);
> -void cqm_test_cleanup(void);
> +void cmt_test_cleanup(void);
> int get_core_sibling(int cpu_no);
> int measure_cache_vals(struct resctrl_val_param *param, int bm_pid);
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
> index 425cc85ac883..35a91cab1b88 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
> @@ -37,10 +37,10 @@ void detect_amd(void)
> static void cmd_help(void)
> {
> printf("usage: resctrl_tests [-h] [-b \"benchmark_cmd [options]\"] [-t test list] [-n no_of_bits]\n");
> - printf("\t-b benchmark_cmd [options]: run specified benchmark for MBM, MBA and CQM");
> + printf("\t-b benchmark_cmd [options]: run specified benchmark for MBM, MBA and CMT");
> printf("\t default benchmark is builtin fill_buf\n");
> printf("\t-t test list: run tests specified in the test list, ");
> - printf("e.g. -t mbm, mba, cqm, cat\n");
> + printf("e.g. -t mbm, mba, cmt, cat\n");
> printf("\t-n no_of_bits: run cache tests using specified no of bits in cache bit mask\n");
> printf("\t-p cpu_no: specify CPU number to run the test. 1 is default\n");
> printf("\t-h: help\n");
> @@ -50,13 +50,13 @@ void tests_cleanup(void)
> {
> mbm_test_cleanup();
> mba_test_cleanup();
> - cqm_test_cleanup();
> + cmt_test_cleanup();
> cat_test_cleanup();
> }
>
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> - bool has_ben = false, mbm_test = true, mba_test = true, cqm_test = true;
> + bool has_ben = false, mbm_test = true, mba_test = true, cmt_test = true;
> int res, c, cpu_no = 1, span = 250, argc_new = argc, i, no_of_bits = 5;
> char *benchmark_cmd[BENCHMARK_ARGS], bw_report[64], bm_type[64];
> char benchmark_cmd_area[BENCHMARK_ARGS][BENCHMARK_ARG_SIZE];
> @@ -82,15 +82,15 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>
> mbm_test = false;
> mba_test = false;
> - cqm_test = false;
> + cmt_test = false;
> cat_test = false;
> while (token) {
> if (!strcmp(token, "mbm")) {
> mbm_test = true;
> } else if (!strcmp(token, "mba")) {
> mba_test = true;
> - } else if (!strcmp(token, "cqm")) {
> - cqm_test = true;
> + } else if (!strcmp(token, "cmt")) {
> + cmt_test = true;
> } else if (!strcmp(token, "cat")) {
> cat_test = true;
Why not use strncmp() here. Also, this code can be cleaned up.
This is error prone. It appears there is a link to these tokens
and offset in the benchmark_cmd[].
> } else {
> @@ -178,13 +178,13 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> tests_run++;
> }
>
> - if (cqm_test) {
> - printf("# Starting CQM test ...\n");
> + if (cmt_test) {
> + printf("# Starting CMT test ...\n");
> if (!has_ben)
> - sprintf(benchmark_cmd[5], "%s", "cqm");
> - res = cqm_resctrl_val(cpu_no, no_of_bits, benchmark_cmd);
> - printf("%sok CQM: test\n", res ? "not " : "");
> - cqm_test_cleanup();
> + sprintf(benchmark_cmd[5], "%s", "cmt");
Like here. Why not add defines that make it easier to read.
> + res = cmt_resctrl_val(cpu_no, no_of_bits, benchmark_cmd);
> + printf("%sok CMT: test\n", res ? "not " : "");
> + cmt_test_cleanup();
> tests_run++;
> }
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c
> index 520fea3606d1..270cd95e0026 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c
> @@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ static int print_results_bw(char *filename, int bm_pid, float bw_imc,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void set_cqm_path(const char *ctrlgrp, const char *mongrp, char sock_num)
> +static void set_cmt_path(const char *ctrlgrp, const char *mongrp, char sock_num)
> {
> if (strlen(ctrlgrp) && strlen(mongrp))
> sprintf(llc_occup_path, CON_MON_LCC_OCCUP_PATH, RESCTRL_PATH,
> @@ -512,7 +512,7 @@ static void set_cqm_path(const char *ctrlgrp, const char *mongrp, char sock_num)
> * @ctrlgrp: Name of the control monitor group (con_mon grp)
> * @mongrp: Name of the monitor group (mon grp)
> * @cpu_no: CPU number that the benchmark PID is binded to
> - * @resctrl_val: Resctrl feature (Eg: cat, cqm.. etc)
> + * @resctrl_val: Resctrl feature (Eg: cat, cmt.. etc)
> */
> static void initialize_llc_occu_resctrl(const char *ctrlgrp, const char *mongrp,
> int cpu_no, char *resctrl_val)
> @@ -524,8 +524,8 @@ static void initialize_llc_occu_resctrl(const char *ctrlgrp, const char *mongrp,
> return;
> }
>
> - if (strcmp(resctrl_val, "cqm") == 0)
> - set_cqm_path(ctrlgrp, mongrp, resource_id);
> + if (strcmp(resctrl_val, "cmt") == 0)
> + set_cmt_path(ctrlgrp, mongrp, resource_id);
Why aren't these strncmp()s. Also these command strings are hard coded
over a over again. Why not add defines for these.
> }
>
> static int
> @@ -682,7 +682,7 @@ int resctrl_val(char **benchmark_cmd, struct resctrl_val_param *param)
>
> initialize_mem_bw_resctrl(param->ctrlgrp, param->mongrp,
> param->cpu_no, resctrl_val);
> - } else if (strcmp(resctrl_val, "cqm") == 0)
> + } else if (strcmp(resctrl_val, "cmt") == 0)
> initialize_llc_occu_resctrl(param->ctrlgrp, param->mongrp,
> param->cpu_no, resctrl_val);
>
> @@ -721,7 +721,7 @@ int resctrl_val(char **benchmark_cmd, struct resctrl_val_param *param)
> ret = measure_vals(param, &bw_resc_start);
> if (ret)
> break;
> - } else if (strcmp(resctrl_val, "cqm") == 0) {
> + } else if (strcmp(resctrl_val, "cmt") == 0) {
> ret = param->setup(1, param);
> if (ret) {
> ret = 0;
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
> index 19c0ec4045a4..727e667e2cc9 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
> @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ void run_benchmark(int signum, siginfo_t *info, void *ucontext)
> operation = atoi(benchmark_cmd[4]);
> sprintf(resctrl_val, "%s", benchmark_cmd[5]);
>
> - if (strcmp(resctrl_val, "cqm") != 0)
> + if (strcmp(resctrl_val, "cmt") != 0)
> buffer_span = span * MB;
> else
> buffer_span = span;
> @@ -458,8 +458,8 @@ int write_bm_pid_to_resctrl(pid_t bm_pid, char *ctrlgrp, char *mongrp,
> if (ret)
> goto out;
>
> - /* Create mon grp and write pid into it for "mbm" and "cqm" test */
> - if ((strcmp(resctrl_val, "cqm") == 0) ||
> + /* Create mon grp and write pid into it for "mbm" and "cmt" test */
> + if ((strcmp(resctrl_val, "cmt") == 0) ||
> (strcmp(resctrl_val, "mbm") == 0)) {
> if (strlen(mongrp)) {
> sprintf(monitorgroup_p, "%s/mon_groups", controlgroup);
> @@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ int write_schemata(char *ctrlgrp, char *schemata, int cpu_no, char *resctrl_val)
>
> if ((strcmp(resctrl_val, "mba") != 0) &&
> (strcmp(resctrl_val, "cat") != 0) &&
> - (strcmp(resctrl_val, "cqm") != 0))
> + (strcmp(resctrl_val, "cmt") != 0))
> return -ENOENT;
>
> if (!schemata) {
> @@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ int write_schemata(char *ctrlgrp, char *schemata, int cpu_no, char *resctrl_val)
> else
> sprintf(controlgroup, "%s/schemata", RESCTRL_PATH);
>
> - if (!strcmp(resctrl_val, "cat") || !strcmp(resctrl_val, "cqm"))
> + if (!strcmp(resctrl_val, "cat") || !strcmp(resctrl_val, "cmt"))
> sprintf(schema, "%s%d%c%s", "L3:", resource_id, '=', schemata);
> if (strcmp(resctrl_val, "mba") == 0)
> sprintf(schema, "%s%d%c%s", "MB:", resource_id, '=', schemata);
>
Let's clean this test up.
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists