lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 27 Oct 2020 22:43:23 +0100
From:   Clément Péron <peron.clem@...il.com>
To:     Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
        Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Marcus Cooper <codekipper@...il.com>,
        linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 01/14] ASoC: sun4i-i2s: Change set_chan_cfg() params

Hi Pierre-Louis,

On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 at 19:59, Pierre-Louis Bossart
<pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>
> > @@ -452,11 +454,11 @@ static int sun8i_i2s_set_chan_cfg(const struct sun4i_i2s *i2s,
> >       case SND_SOC_DAIFMT_DSP_B:
> >       case SND_SOC_DAIFMT_LEFT_J:
> >       case SND_SOC_DAIFMT_RIGHT_J:
> > -             lrck_period = params_physical_width(params) * slots;
> > +             lrck_period = slot_width * slots;
> >               break;
> >
> >       case SND_SOC_DAIFMT_I2S:
> > -             lrck_period = params_physical_width(params);
> > +             lrck_period = slot_width;
> >               break;
>
> Aren't I2S, LEFT_J and RIGHT_J pretty much the same in terms of lrclk
> rate/period? the only thing that can change is the polarity, no?
>
> Not sure why it's handled differently here?

I just had a look at the User Manual for H3 and H6 and I didn't find
any reason why LEFT_J and RIGHT_J should be computed in a different
way as I2S.

Also the commit introducing this doesn't mention it.
7ae7834ec446 ("ASoC: sun4i-i2s: Add support for DSP formats")

I can't test it with my board but if nobody complains about it, I will
introduce a fix for this in the next version and change this also for
H6.

Thanks for your review,
Clement

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ