linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fix swiotlb panic on Xen

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 27 Oct 2020 14:53:58 -0700 (PDT)
From:   Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>
To:     Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
cc:     Elliott Mitchell <ehem+undef@....com>,
        Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, hch@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix swiotlb panic on Xen

On Tue, 27 Oct 2020, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > As the person who first found this and then confirmed this fixes a bug:
> > 
> > Tested-by: Elliott Mitchell <ehem+xen@....com>
> 
> Thank you!!
> 
> I changed the title and added the various tags and will put it in
> linux-next later this week.

Looks fine, thank you


> >From a1eb2768bf5954d25aa0f0136b38f0aa5d92d984 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...inx.com>
> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 17:02:14 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] swiotlb: fix "x86: Don't panic if can not alloc buffer for
>  swiotlb"
> 
> kernel/dma/swiotlb.c:swiotlb_init gets called first and tries to
> allocate a buffer for the swiotlb. It does so by calling
> 
>   memblock_alloc_low(PAGE_ALIGN(bytes), PAGE_SIZE);
> 
> If the allocation must fail, no_iotlb_memory is set.
> 
> Later during initialization swiotlb-xen comes in
> (drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c:xen_swiotlb_init) and given that io_tlb_start
> is != 0, it thinks the memory is ready to use when actually it is not.
> 
> When the swiotlb is actually needed, swiotlb_tbl_map_single gets called
> and since no_iotlb_memory is set the kernel panics.
> 
> Instead, if swiotlb-xen.c:xen_swiotlb_init knew the swiotlb hadn't been
> initialized, it would do the initialization itself, which might still
> succeed.
> 
> Fix the panic by setting io_tlb_start to 0 on swiotlb initialization
> failure, and also by setting no_iotlb_memory to false on swiotlb
> initialization success.
> 
> Fixes: ac2cbab21f31 ("x86: Don't panic if can not alloc buffer for swiotlb")
> 
> Reported-by: Elliott Mitchell <ehem+xen@....com>
> Tested-by: Elliott Mitchell <ehem+xen@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...inx.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> CC: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
> ---
>  kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> index 465a567678d9..e08cac39c0ba 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> @@ -229,6 +229,7 @@ int __init swiotlb_init_with_tbl(char *tlb, unsigned long nslabs, int verbose)
>  		io_tlb_orig_addr[i] = INVALID_PHYS_ADDR;
>  	}
>  	io_tlb_index = 0;
> +	no_iotlb_memory = false;
>  
>  	if (verbose)
>  		swiotlb_print_info();
> @@ -260,9 +261,11 @@ swiotlb_init(int verbose)
>  	if (vstart && !swiotlb_init_with_tbl(vstart, io_tlb_nslabs, verbose))
>  		return;
>  
> -	if (io_tlb_start)
> +	if (io_tlb_start) {
>  		memblock_free_early(io_tlb_start,
>  				    PAGE_ALIGN(io_tlb_nslabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT));
> +		io_tlb_start = 0;
> +	}
>  	pr_warn("Cannot allocate buffer");
>  	no_iotlb_memory = true;
>  }
> @@ -360,6 +363,7 @@ swiotlb_late_init_with_tbl(char *tlb, unsigned long nslabs)
>  		io_tlb_orig_addr[i] = INVALID_PHYS_ADDR;
>  	}
>  	io_tlb_index = 0;
> +	no_iotlb_memory = false;
>  
>  	swiotlb_print_info();
>  
> -- 
> 2.13.6
>