[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0bc19d43229d73c0fcd5bda1987e3dbb9d62a7e0.camel@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 21:32:11 +0000
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
"Davi E. M. Arnaut" <davi@...ent.com.br>, davi@...desmares.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/wait: Add add_wait_queue_priority()
On Tue, 2020-10-27 at 21:30 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 07:27:59PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> > > While looking at this I found that weird __add_wait_queue_exclusive()
> > > which is used by fs/eventpoll.c and does something similar, except it
> > > doesn't keep the FIFO order.
> >
> > It does, doesn't it? Except those so-called "exclusive" entries end up
> > in FIFO order amongst themselves at the *tail* of the queue, to be
> > woken up only after all the other entries before them *haven't* been
> > excluded.
>
> __add_wait_queue_exclusive() uses __add_wait_queue() which does
> list_add(). It does _not_ add at the tail like normal exclusive users,
> and there is exactly _1_ user in tree that does this.
>
> I'm not exactly sure how this happened, but:
>
> add_wait_queue_exclusive()
>
> and
>
> __add_wait_queue_exclusive()
>
> are not related :-(
I think that goes all the way back to here:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/4/530
It was rounded up in commit d47de16c72and subsequently "cleaned up"
into an inline in wait.h, but I don't think there was ever a reason for
it to be added to the head of the list instead of the tail.
So I think we can reasonably make __add_wait_queue_exclusive() do
precisely the same thing as add_wait_queue_exclusive() does (modulo
locking).
And then potentially rename them both to something that isn't quite
such a lie. And give me the one I want that *does* actually exclude
other waiters :)
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (5174 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists