[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201027055658.GA10292@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 14:56:58 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4] perf kvm: add kvm-stat for arm64
On (20/10/13 23:29), Leo Yan wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 11:37:09AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 12:34:50PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky escreveu:
> > > On (20/09/17 19:02), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > > > Add support for perf kvm stat on arm64 platform.
[..]
> > > Arnaldo, any opinion on this?
> >
> > I'm not finding the actual patch, just this reply from you, lets try
> > with b4 using this message Message-Id... Magic! But it isn't applying,
> > can you please refresh the patch to what is in my perf/core branch?
>
> I did a quick trying, the merge confliction is caused by the file
> tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/Build (for the new added tsc.c).
>
> @Sergey, please help to rebase on the latest perf/core branch [1].
Will do by the end of today! Sorry for the delay, somehow this whole
followup conversation missed my inbox.
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists