[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d5050762b88d5d0d957ad5057f165b21@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 12:38:02 +0530
From: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>
To: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@...eaurora.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@...eaurora.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Sharat Masetty <smasetty@...eaurora.org>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm/a6xx: Add support for using system cache on
MMU500 based targets
On 2020-10-27 00:24, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> This is an extension to the series [1] to enable the System Cache (LLC)
> for
> Adreno a6xx targets.
>
> GPU targets with an MMU-500 attached have a slightly different process
> for
> enabling system cache. Use the compatible string on the IOMMU phandle
> to see if an MMU-500 is attached and modify the programming sequence
> accordingly.
>
> [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/83037/
>
> Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@...eaurora.org>
> ---
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++------
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> index 95c98c642876..b7737732fbb6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> @@ -1042,6 +1042,8 @@ static void a6xx_llc_deactivate(struct a6xx_gpu
> *a6xx_gpu)
>
> static void a6xx_llc_activate(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu)
> {
> + struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = &a6xx_gpu->base;
> + struct msm_gpu *gpu = &adreno_gpu->base;
> u32 cntl1_regval = 0;
>
> if (IS_ERR(a6xx_gpu->llc_mmio))
> @@ -1055,11 +1057,17 @@ static void a6xx_llc_activate(struct a6xx_gpu
> *a6xx_gpu)
> (gpu_scid << 15) | (gpu_scid << 20);
> }
>
> + /*
> + * For targets with a MMU500, activate the slice but don't program
> the
> + * register. The XBL will take care of that.
> + */
> if (!llcc_slice_activate(a6xx_gpu->htw_llc_slice)) {
> - u32 gpuhtw_scid = llcc_get_slice_id(a6xx_gpu->htw_llc_slice);
> + if (!a6xx_gpu->have_mmu500) {
> + u32 gpuhtw_scid = llcc_get_slice_id(a6xx_gpu->htw_llc_slice);
>
> - gpuhtw_scid &= 0x1f;
> - cntl1_regval |= FIELD_PREP(GENMASK(29, 25), gpuhtw_scid);
> + gpuhtw_scid &= 0x1f;
> + cntl1_regval |= FIELD_PREP(GENMASK(29, 25), gpuhtw_scid);
> + }
> }
>
> if (cntl1_regval) {
> @@ -1067,13 +1075,20 @@ static void a6xx_llc_activate(struct a6xx_gpu
> *a6xx_gpu)
> * Program the slice IDs for the various GPU blocks and GPU MMU
> * pagetables
> */
> - a6xx_llc_write(a6xx_gpu, REG_A6XX_CX_MISC_SYSTEM_CACHE_CNTL_1,
> cntl1_regval);
> -
> - /*
> - * Program cacheability overrides to not allocate cache lines on
> - * a write miss
> - */
> - a6xx_llc_rmw(a6xx_gpu, REG_A6XX_CX_MISC_SYSTEM_CACHE_CNTL_0, 0xF,
> 0x03);
> + if (a6xx_gpu->have_mmu500)
> + gpu_rmw(gpu, REG_A6XX_GBIF_SCACHE_CNTL1, GENMASK(24, 0),
> + cntl1_regval);
> + else {
> + a6xx_llc_write(a6xx_gpu,
> + REG_A6XX_CX_MISC_SYSTEM_CACHE_CNTL_1, cntl1_regval);
> +
> + /*
> + * Program cacheability overrides to not allocate cache
> + * lines on a write miss
> + */
> + a6xx_llc_rmw(a6xx_gpu,
> + REG_A6XX_CX_MISC_SYSTEM_CACHE_CNTL_0, 0xF, 0x03);
> + }
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1086,10 +1101,21 @@ static void a6xx_llc_slices_destroy(struct
> a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu)
> static void a6xx_llc_slices_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu)
> {
> + struct device_node *phandle;
> +
> a6xx_gpu->llc_mmio = msm_ioremap(pdev, "cx_mem", "gpu_cx");
> if (IS_ERR(a6xx_gpu->llc_mmio))
> return;
>
> + /*
> + * There is a different programming path for targets with an mmu500
> + * attached, so detect if that is the case
> + */
> + phandle = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, "iommus", 0);
> + a6xx_gpu->have_mmu500 = (phandle &&
> + of_device_is_compatible(phandle, "arm,mmu500"));
> + of_node_put(phandle);
> +
> a6xx_gpu->llc_slice = llcc_slice_getd(LLCC_GPU);
> a6xx_gpu->htw_llc_slice = llcc_slice_getd(LLCC_GPUHTW);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.h
> index 9e6079af679c..e793d329e77b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.h
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ struct a6xx_gpu {
> void __iomem *llc_mmio;
> void *llc_slice;
> void *htw_llc_slice;
> + bool have_mmu500;
> };
>
> #define to_a6xx_gpu(x) container_of(x, struct a6xx_gpu, base)
Thanks Jordan for the patch.
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
Powered by blists - more mailing lists