[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201027072855.655449-1-namhyung@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 16:28:54 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] perf test: Use generic event for expand_libpfm_events()
I found that the UNHALTED_CORE_CYCLES event is only available in the
Intel machines and it makes other vendors/archs fail on the test. As
libpfm4 can parse the generic events like cycles, let's use them.
Fixes: 40b74c30ffb9 ("perf test: Add expand cgroup event test")
Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
---
tools/perf/tests/expand-cgroup.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/expand-cgroup.c b/tools/perf/tests/expand-cgroup.c
index d5771e4d094f..4c59f3ae438f 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/expand-cgroup.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/expand-cgroup.c
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static int expand_libpfm_events(void)
int ret;
struct evlist *evlist;
struct rblist metric_events;
- const char event_str[] = "UNHALTED_CORE_CYCLES";
+ const char event_str[] = "CYCLES";
struct option opt = {
.value = &evlist,
};
--
2.29.0.rc2.309.g374f81d7ae-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists