[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a30xWy5nOZqYF16nuODfThsKxjqp6J2-PanKiv09SxVYg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 09:41:03 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@...ine-koenig.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printf: fix Woverride-init warning for EDEADLK errno
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 7:55 AM Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@...ine-koenig.org> wrote:
> On 10/26/20 10:49 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > Make that line conditional on the two values being distinct.
> >
> > Fixes: 57f5677e535b ("printf: add support for printing symbolic error names")
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> > ---
> > lib/errname.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/errname.c b/lib/errname.c
> > index 0c4d3e66170e..6adff0bf2445 100644
> > --- a/lib/errname.c
> > +++ b/lib/errname.c
> > @@ -169,7 +169,9 @@ static const char *names_0[] = {
> > E(ECANCELED), /* ECANCELLED */
> > E(EAGAIN), /* EWOULDBLOCK */
> > E(ECONNREFUSED), /* EREFUSED */
> > +#if EDEADLK != EDEADLOCK
> > E(EDEADLK), /* EDEADLOCK */
> > +#endif
>
> The comments suggest that duplicates are expected. Would it make sense
> to add similar conditions to the other three entries?
The other ones are always aliases, so there is no point in having
an #ifdef. The reason we need to handle EDEADLK separately
is that it's an alias on most architectures but not on on others,
specifically mips, powerpc and sparc.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists