linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/14] media: sun6i-csi: Support an optional dedicated memory pool

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201027092638.GC168350@aptenodytes>
Date:   Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:26:38 +0100
From:   Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>
To:     Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
Cc:     linux-media@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Yong Deng <yong.deng@...ewell.com>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Helen Koike <helen.koike@...labora.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>, kevin.lhopital@...mail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/14] media: sun6i-csi: Support an optional dedicated
 memory pool

Hi,

On Mon 26 Oct 20, 16:41, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 07:45:35PM +0200, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > This allows selecting a dedicated CMA memory pool (specified via
> > device-tree) instead of the default one.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>
> 
> Why would that be needed?

Sorry for the confusion, this is indeed unrelated to the current series and
it is not needed for MIPI CSI-2 support.

However, I think it's a worthwhile addition to the driver.
I will take it out of the series and re-submit it separately then.

> > ---
> >  drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun6i-csi/sun6i_csi.c | 8 ++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun6i-csi/sun6i_csi.c b/drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun6i-csi/sun6i_csi.c
> > index 28e89340fed9..5d2389a5cd17 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun6i-csi/sun6i_csi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun6i-csi/sun6i_csi.c
> > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> >  #include <linux/of.h>
> >  #include <linux/of_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
> >  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >  #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> >  #include <linux/regmap.h>
> > @@ -849,6 +850,12 @@ static int sun6i_csi_resource_request(struct sun6i_csi_dev *sdev,
> >  		return PTR_ERR(sdev->regmap);
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	ret = of_reserved_mem_device_init(&pdev->dev);
> > +	if (ret && ret != -ENODEV) {
> > +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unable to init reserved memory\n");
> > +		return ret;
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	sdev->clk_mod = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "mod");
> 
> If that clk_get or any subsequent function fail you'll end up leaking
> whatever the initialization of the reserved memory has allocated

Right, there's a missing of_reserved_mem_device_release in the error path here.

Thanks!

Paul

-- 
Paul Kocialkowski, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)