linux-kernel - [PATCH 3/3] x86/debug: Fix PTRACE_{BLOCK,SINGLE}STEP vs ptrace_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201027093608.096535386@infradead.org>
Date:   Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:15:07 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     tglx@...utronix.de, luto@...nel.org, me@...ehuey.com
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, rocallahan@...il.com,
        alexandre.chartre@...cle.com, paulmck@...nel.org,
        frederic@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com,
        sean.j.christopherson@...el.com, mhiramat@...nel.org,
        pmladek@...e.com, joel@...lfernandes.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, jgross@...e.com, brgerst@...il.com,
        jpoimboe@...hat.com, daniel.thompson@...aro.org,
        julliard@...ehq.org, pgofman@...eweavers.com, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] x86/debug: Fix PTRACE_{BLOCK,SINGLE}STEP vs ptrace_get_debugreg(6)

Commit d53d9bc0cf78 ("x86/debug: Change thread.debugreg6 to
thread.virtual_dr6") changed the semantics of the variable from random
collection of bits, to exactly only those bits that ptrace() needs.

Unfortunately we lost DR_STEP for PTRACE_{BLOCK,SINGLE}STEP.

Fixes: d53d9bc0cf78 ("x86/debug: Change thread.debugreg6 to thread.virtual_dr6")
Reported-by: Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/ptrace.h |    2 ++
 arch/x86/kernel/step.c        |    9 +++++++++
 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c       |    2 +-
 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/ptrace.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/ptrace.h
@@ -355,6 +355,8 @@ static inline unsigned long regs_get_ker
 #define arch_has_block_step()	(boot_cpu_data.x86 >= 6)
 #endif
 
+extern unsigned long user_dr_step(unsigned long dr6);
+
 #define ARCH_HAS_USER_SINGLE_STEP_REPORT
 
 struct user_desc;
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/step.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/step.c
@@ -235,3 +235,12 @@ void user_disable_single_step(struct tas
 	if (test_and_clear_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_FORCED_TF))
 		task_pt_regs(child)->flags &= ~X86_EFLAGS_TF;
 }
+
+unsigned long user_dr_step(unsigned long dr6)
+{
+	if (test_thread_flag(TIF_BLOCKSTEP) ||
+	    test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP))
+		return dr6 & DR_STEP;
+
+	return 0;
+}
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
@@ -940,7 +940,7 @@ static __always_inline void exc_debug_us
 	 * Clear the virtual DR6 value, ptrace() routines will set bits here
 	 * for things it wants signals for.
 	 */
-	current->thread.virtual_dr6 = 0;
+	current->thread.virtual_dr6 = user_dr_step(dr6);
 
 	/*
 	 * The SDM says "The processor clears the BTF flag when it