lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201028085127.GV2628@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Wed, 28 Oct 2020 09:51:27 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        "Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@...utronix.de>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] seqlock: avoid -Wshadow warnings

On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 12:34:10AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 5:58 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 05:50:38PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > > -     unsigned seq;                                                   \
> > > +     unsigned __seq;                                                 \
> >
> > > -     unsigned seq = __read_seqcount_begin(s);                        \
> > > +     unsigned _seq = __read_seqcount_begin(s);                       \
> >
> > > -     unsigned seq = __seqcount_sequence(s);                          \
> > > +     unsigned __seq = __seqcount_sequence(s);                        \
> >
> > Can we have a consistent number of leading '_' ?
> 
> Not really ;-)

Duh.. ok, I'll take it as is.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ