[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201028110835.2f319c0a@xps13>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 11:08:35 +0100
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Praveenkumar I <ipkumar@...eaurora.org>
Cc: richard@....at, vigneshr@...com, sivaprak@...eaurora.org,
peter.ujfalusi@...com, boris.brezillon@...labora.com,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, kathirav@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: qcom: Fix DMA sync on FLASH_STATUS
register read
Hello,
Praveenkumar I <ipkumar@...eaurora.org> wrote on Fri, 9 Oct 2020
13:37:52 +0530:
> After each codeword NAND_FLASH_STATUS is read for possible operational
> failures. But there is no DMA sync for CPU operation before reading it
> and this leads to incorrect or older copy of DMA buffer in reg_read_buf.
>
> This patch adds the DMA sync on reg_read_buf for CPU before reading it.
>
> Fixes: 5bc36b2bf6e2 ("mtd: rawnand: qcom: check for operation errors in case of raw read")
I guess this deserves a proper Cc: stable tag?
> Signed-off-by: Praveenkumar I <ipkumar@...eaurora.org>
I think your full name is required in the SoB line (should match the
authorship).
Otherwise looks good to me.
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> index bd7a7251429b..5bb85f1ba84c 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> @@ -1570,6 +1570,8 @@ static int check_flash_errors(struct qcom_nand_host *host, int cw_cnt)
> struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
> int i;
>
> + nandc_read_buffer_sync(nandc, true);
> +
> for (i = 0; i < cw_cnt; i++) {
> u32 flash = le32_to_cpu(nandc->reg_read_buf[i]);
>
Thanks,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists