[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87eelifbx6.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 19:22:29 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
rafael@...nel.org, martin.petersen@...cle.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com
Cc: linuxarm@...wei.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, maz@...nel.org,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] genirq/affinity: Add irq_update_affinity_desc()
On Wed, Oct 28 2020 at 20:33, John Garry wrote:
>
> +int irq_update_affinity_desc(unsigned int irq,
> + struct irq_affinity_desc *affinity)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> + struct irq_desc *desc = irq_get_desc_lock(irq, &flags, 0);
> +
> + if (!desc)
> + return -EINVAL;
Just looking at it some more. This needs a check whether the interrupt
is actually shut down. Otherwise the update will corrupt
state. Something like this:
if (irqd_is_started(&desc->irq_data))
return -EBUSY;
But all of this can't work on x86 due to the way how vector allocation
works. Let me think about that.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists