[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201028172106.GA10015@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 18:21:06 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH kernel v2 1/2] dma: Allow mixing bypass and normal
IOMMU operation
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 05:55:23PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>
> It is passing an address of the end of the mapped area so passing a page
> struct means passing page and offset which is an extra parameter and we do
> not want to do anything with the page in those hooks anyway so I'd keep it
> as is.
>
>
>> and
>> maybe even hide the dma_map_direct inside it.
>
> Call dma_map_direct() from arch_dma_map_page_direct() if
> arch_dma_map_page_direct() is defined? Seems suboptimal as it is going to
> be bypass=true in most cases and we save one call by avoiding calling
> arch_dma_map_page_direct(). Unless I missed something?
C does not even evaluate the right hand side of a || expression if the
left hand evaluates to true.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists