linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 41/52] memory: tegra124-emc: Use devm_platform_ioremap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201028192821.GB170285@kozik-lap>
Date:   Wed, 28 Oct 2020 20:28:21 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
        MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
        Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
        Mikko Perttunen <cyndis@...si.fi>,
        Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
        Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>,
        Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@...il.com>,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 41/52] memory: tegra124-emc: Use
 devm_platform_ioremap_resource()

On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 11:30:31PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 27.10.2020 13:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski пишет:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 01:17:24AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >> Use devm_platform_ioremap_resource() helper which makes code a bit
> >> cleaner.
> > 
> > Such cleanups (and few other in this patchset) should be at beginning of
> > patchset or even as part of a separate one.  I think there is not much
> > stopping anyone from applying these... except that you put them in the
> > middle of big dependency.
> 
> Some of these cleanup patches can't be applied separately without a need
> to make a rebase. I think it should be more preferred to have all the
> patches within a single series.
> 
> I'll try to reorder the patches in v7 if this will ease the review, thanks.

If feasible, that would be good. Thanks.

Best regards,
Krzysztof