[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201028054957.vr47r3wd3zjycten@vireshk-i7>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 11:19:57 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>,
Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>,
"open list:THERMAL" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] sched/core: Rename and move schedutil_cpu_util()
to core.c
On 23-10-20, 14:34, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Maybe it's time to make sched_util and pelt available for !SMP too.
>
> With util_est and uclamp, I can see some benefits for !SMP compare to ondemand
That's a decision you guys (sched maintainers) need to make :)
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists