[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201028040637.26kw2qk7digel6yb@vireshk-i7>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 09:36:37 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: ulf.hansson@...aro.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
nks@...wful.org, georgi.djakov@...aro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] opp: Allow dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() to return
-EPROBE_DEFER
On 27-10-20, 15:24, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Trying again through different e-mail provider. My previous e-mail
> got stuck in spam filters. Apologies if this is received multiple
> times.
I received only once :)
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 02:39:32PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > From: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>
> >
> [ ... ]
You removed way too much and this lost the context. Keeping the
routine's prototype line would have been useful.
> >
> > opp_table = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table(dev);
> > - if (!opp_table)
> > - return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > + if (!IS_ERR(opp_table))
> > + return opp_table;
>
> This should have been
>
> if (IS_ERR(opp_table))
> return opp_table;
I believe this is the delta from dev_pm_opp_register_set_opp_helper()
?
A proper fix is already pushed in linux-next for this yesterday.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists