linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/15] iio: adc: stm32: remove unnecessary CONFIG_PM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 29 Oct 2020 12:31:19 +0100
From:   Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...com>
To:     Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@...il.com>
CC:     Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        "open list:IIO SUBSYSTEM AND DRIVERS" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/STM32 ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        "moderated list:ARM/STM32 ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/15] iio: adc: stm32: remove unnecessary CONFIG_PM_SLEEP

On 10/29/20 8:49 AM, Coiby Xu wrote:
> SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS has already took good care of CONFIG_PM_CONFIG.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c
> index b3f31f147347..42f9013730f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c
> @@ -1988,7 +1988,6 @@ static int stm32_adc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -#if defined(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP)

Hi Coiby,

This generates warnings when building with W=1 and CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n.
Could you please add also "__maybe_unused" attribute in suspend / resume
routines below.

>  static int stm32_adc_suspend(struct device *dev)
             ^
e.g. like: static int __maybe_unused stm32_adc_...

>  {
>  	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> @@ -2018,7 +2017,6 @@ static int stm32_adc_resume(struct device *dev)
>  
>  	return stm32_adc_buffer_postenable(indio_dev);
>  }
> -#endif
>  
>  #if defined(CONFIG_PM)

Same could be done also for runtime PM routines. For my own curiosity,
do you plan to do this as well ?

Best regards,
Fabrice
>  static int stm32_adc_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
>