linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] powerpc: avoid broken GCC __attribute_

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXHFS7BonvRaSYCn+1rTXKsT8qfQocRaYovj-BTNZw_qng@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 28 Oct 2020 09:29:48 +0100
From:   Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
To:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     "open list:LINUX FOR POWERPC (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" 
        <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: avoid broken GCC __attribute__((optimize))

On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 at 09:04, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Commit 7053f80d9696 ("powerpc/64: Prevent stack protection in early boot")
> introduced a couple of uses of __attribute__((optimize)) with function
> scope, to disable the stack protector in some early boot code.
>
> Unfortunately, and this is documented in the GCC man pages [0], overriding
> function attributes for optimization is broken, and is only supported for
> debug scenarios, not for production: the problem appears to be that
> setting GCC -f flags using this method will cause it to forget about some
> or all other optimization settings that have been applied.
>
> So the only safe way to disable the stack protector is to disable it for
> the entire source file.
>
> [0] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Common-Function-Attributes.html
>
> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
> Cc: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>
> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Fixes: 7053f80d9696 ("powerpc/64: Prevent stack protection in early boot")
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
> ---
> Related discussion here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAMuHMdUg0WJHEcq6to0-eODpXPOywLot6UD2=GFHpzoj_hCoBQ@mail.gmail.com/
>
> TL;DR using __attribute__((optimize("-fno-gcse"))) in the BPF interpreter
> causes the compiler to forget about -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables passed
> on the command line, resulting in unexpected .eh_frame sections in vmlinux.
>
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile   | 3 +++
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/paca.c     | 2 +-
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/setup.h    | 6 ------
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c | 2 +-
>  4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>

FYI i was notified by one of the robots that I missed one occurrence
of __nostackprotector in arch/powerpc/kernel/paca.c

Let me know if I need to resend.


> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile
> index bf0bf1b900d2..fe2ef598e2ea 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -173,6 +173,9 @@ KCOV_INSTRUMENT_cputable.o := n
>  KCOV_INSTRUMENT_setup_64.o := n
>  KCOV_INSTRUMENT_paca.o := n
>
> +CFLAGS_setup_64.o              += -fno-stack-protector
> +CFLAGS_paca.o                  += -fno-stack-protector
> +
>  extra-$(CONFIG_PPC_FPU)                += fpu.o
>  extra-$(CONFIG_ALTIVEC)                += vector.o
>  extra-$(CONFIG_PPC64)          += entry_64.o
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/paca.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/paca.c
> index 0ad15768d762..fe70834d7283 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/paca.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/paca.c
> @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static struct rtas_args * __init new_rtas_args(int cpu, unsigned long limit)
>  struct paca_struct **paca_ptrs __read_mostly;
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(paca_ptrs);
>
> -void __init __nostackprotector initialise_paca(struct paca_struct *new_paca, int cpu)
> +void __init initialise_paca(struct paca_struct *new_paca, int cpu)
>  {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_PSERIES
>         new_paca->lppaca_ptr = NULL;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup.h b/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup.h
> index 2ec835574cc9..2dd0d9cb5a20 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup.h
> @@ -8,12 +8,6 @@
>  #ifndef __ARCH_POWERPC_KERNEL_SETUP_H
>  #define __ARCH_POWERPC_KERNEL_SETUP_H
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
> -#define __nostackprotector
> -#else
> -#define __nostackprotector __attribute__((__optimize__("no-stack-protector")))
> -#endif
> -
>  void initialize_cache_info(void);
>  void irqstack_early_init(void);
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c
> index bb9cab3641d7..da447a62ea1e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c
> @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ void __init record_spr_defaults(void)
>   * device-tree is not accessible via normal means at this point.
>   */
>
> -void __init __nostackprotector early_setup(unsigned long dt_ptr)
> +void __init early_setup(unsigned long dt_ptr)
>  {
>         static __initdata struct paca_struct boot_paca;
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>