[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2W-BcRyxx7+JXr+MCBLSuLzLdEDzM8LMk5y1rjaEuXbw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 14:35:53 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm64: hide more compat_vdso code
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 5:55 PM Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 05:03:29PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> >
> > When CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO is disabled, we get a warning
> > about a potential out-of-bounds access:
> >
> > arch/arm64/kernel/vdso.c: In function 'aarch32_vdso_mremap':
> > arch/arm64/kernel/vdso.c:86:37: warning: array subscript 1 is above array bounds of 'struct vdso_abi_info[1]' [-Warray-bounds]
> > 86 | unsigned long vdso_size = vdso_info[abi].vdso_code_end -
> > | ~~~~~~~~~^~~~~
> >
> > This is all in dead code however that the compiler is unable to
> > eliminate by itself.
> >
> > Change the array to individual local variables that can be
> > dropped in dead code elimination to let the compiler understand
> > this better.
> >
> > Fixes: 0cbc2659123e ("arm64: vdso32: Remove a bunch of #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO guards")
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> This looks like a nice cleanup to me! I agree we don't need the array
> here.
>
> Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Thanks!
I see the patch now conflicts with "mm: forbid splitting special mappings"
in -mm, by Dmitry Safonov. I have rebased my patch on top, should
I send it to Andrew for inclusion in -mm then?
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists