linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 7/9] mm/vmscan: Consider anonymous pages without swap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <99dff0cd-2b1a-2c41-2596-eda7ecc7c160@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 29 Oct 2020 07:33:07 -0700
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        kbusch@...nel.org, vishal.l.verma@...el.com,
        yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
        ying.huang@...el.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com, david@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 7/9] mm/vmscan: Consider anonymous pages without swap

On 10/29/20 1:14 AM, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> With this patch, we will use always the atomic version
> get_nr_swap_pages from now on. Is that ok? I guess so, but it might
> warrant a mention in the changelog?

I _think_ it's OK.  But, you're right that it's a potential behavior
change that's not mentioned in the changelog.

I'll mention it in the changelog and see if I can dream up any other
practical implications from this change.

Thanks for taking a look!