linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/15] iio: accel: remove unnecessary CONFIG_PM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201029144332.bnaoeztlydmob5jt@Rk>
Date:   Thu, 29 Oct 2020 22:43:32 +0800
From:   Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@...il.com>
To:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc:     Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        "open list:IIO SUBSYSTEM AND DRIVERS" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/15] iio: accel: remove unnecessary CONFIG_PM_SLEEP

HI Jonathan,

On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 02:40:07PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>On Thu, 29 Oct 2020 15:48:56 +0800
>Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS has already took good care of CONFIG_PM_CONFIG.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@...il.com>
>Hi Coiby,
>
>Please put a cover letter on your next series explaining the context.
>In this particular case some of the replies you have gotten are
>general at it is a lot easier to find these sorts of things via
>replying to the cover letter.
>

I will do it in v2. Thank you for the suggestion!

>Jonathan
>
>> ---
>>  drivers/iio/accel/da311.c | 2 --
>>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/da311.c b/drivers/iio/accel/da311.c
>> index 3b3df620ba27..55d4891556ca 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/da311.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/da311.c
>> @@ -263,7 +263,6 @@ static int da311_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>>  	return da311_enable(client, false);
>>  }
>>
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>>  static int da311_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>  {
>>  	return da311_enable(to_i2c_client(dev), false);
>> @@ -273,7 +272,6 @@ static int da311_resume(struct device *dev)
>>  {
>>  	return da311_enable(to_i2c_client(dev), true);
>>  }
>> -#endif
>>
>>  static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(da311_pm_ops, da311_suspend, da311_resume);
>>
>

--
Best regards,
Coiby