[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201029151847.GB5042@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 15:18:47 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regmap: provide regmap_assign_bits()
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 04:10:15PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
>
> Add another bits helper to regmap API: this one sets given bits if value
> is true and clears them if it's false.
What's the use case?
> +static inline int regmap_assign_bits(struct regmap *map, unsigned int reg,
> + unsigned int bits, bool value)
I don't have a great suggestion but this naming feels prone to confusion
with _update_bits().
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists