lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <93180c2d-268c-3c33-7c54-4221dfe0d7ad@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 29 Oct 2020 17:59:54 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
        David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc:     'Arnd Bergmann' <arnd@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        "linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org" 
        <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        "xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
        "iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v2] x86: apic: avoid -Wshadow warning in header

On 29/10/20 17:56, Arvind Sankar wrote:
>> For those two just add:
>> 	struct apic *apic = x86_system_apic;
>> before all the assignments.
>> Less churn and much better code.
>>
> Why would it be better code?
> 

I think he means the compiler produces better code, because it won't
read the global variable repeatedly.  Not sure if that's true,(*) but I
think I do prefer that version if Arnd wants to do that tweak.

Paolo

(*) if it is, it might also be due to Linux using -fno-strict-aliasing

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ