[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201029144935.09c4ce8b@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 14:49:35 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Qiujun Huang <hqjagain@...il.com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] tracing: Fix out of bounds write in get_trace_buf
On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 00:19:05 +0800
Qiujun Huang <hqjagain@...il.com> wrote:
> The subscript should be nesting - 1, as nesting had self-added.
>
> Fixes: 3d9622c12c887 ("tracing: Add barrier to trace_printk() buffer nesting modification")
Thanks, I'll still use the updated change log.
-- Steve
> Signed-off-by: Qiujun Huang <hqjagain@...il.com>
> ---
> v4:
> Find the right patch which cause the problem.
> v3:
> Modify the way of array reference instead.
> v2:
> Fix a typo in the title.
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> index 528971714fc6..daa96215e294 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> @@ -3132,7 +3132,7 @@ static char *get_trace_buf(void)
>
> /* Interrupts must see nesting incremented before we use the buffer */
> barrier();
> - return &buffer->buffer[buffer->nesting][0];
> + return &buffer->buffer[buffer->nesting - 1][0];
> }
>
> static void put_trace_buf(void)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists