linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] mac80211: add KCOV remote annotations to incoming frame processing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 29 Oct 2020 20:08:02 +0100
From:   Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
To:     Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Cc:     Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
        Aleksandr Nogikh <aleksandrnogikh@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
        Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] mac80211: add KCOV remote annotations to incoming
 frame processing

On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 7:00 PM Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 29 Oct 2020 at 18:44, Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2020-10-29 at 17:36 +0000, Aleksandr Nogikh wrote:
> > > From: Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@...gle.com>
> > >
> > > Add KCOV remote annotations to ieee80211_iface_work() and
> > > ieee80211_rx_list(). This will enable coverage-guided fuzzing of
> > > mac80211 code that processes incoming 802.11 frames.
> >
> > I have no idea how we'll get this merged - Jakub, do you want to take
> > the whole series? Or is somebody else responsible for the core kcov
> > part?
>
> Typically core kcov changes have been going via the -mm tree.
>
> Andrey has been making most changes to KCOV recently, so if there are
> no pending changes that conflict, I don't see it's a problem for this
> whole series to go through networking. I think the other series that
> Andrey had been working on has been changed to only touch
> drivers/usb/, so there should be no conflicts pending.
>
> Dmitry, Andrey, is that reasonable?

Yes, sounds good. FTR, USB kcov changes go through the usb tree.