| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20201028204416.GF20482@e120937-lin>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 20:44:17 +0000
From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
To: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, lukasz.luba@....com,
Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@...adcom.com>,
Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, broonie@...nel.org,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, satyakim@....qualcomm.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Souvik Chakravarty <souvik.chakravarty@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Add Voltage Domain Support
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 03:29:57PM +0100, Etienne Carriere wrote:
> Hi Cristian,
>
> Some remaining minor comments see below.
> FYI I've successfully tested this series (the 4 patches).
>
Hi
Thanks a lot !
Replies inline down below.
[snip]
> > +struct scmi_msg_cmd_config_set {
> > + __le32 domain_id;
> > + __le32 config;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct scmi_msg_cmd_level_set {
> > + __le32 domain_id;
> > + __le32 flags;
> > + __le32 voltage_level;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct voltage_info {
> > + u32 version;
> > + u16 num_domains;
>
> Could be an unsigned int.
>
I tend to use fixed size types matching the protocols messages sizing on
the internal while exposing non-fixed size types in scmi_protocol.h like
in scmi_voltage_info, but these indeed are values exposed directly to
the user afterwards. Any other reason to prefer non-fixed size here ?
> > + struct scmi_voltage_info **domains;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int scmi_protocol_attributes_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle,
> > + struct voltage_info *vinfo)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > + struct scmi_xfer *t;
> > + struct scmi_msg_resp_protocol_attributes *resp;
> > +
> > + ret = scmi_xfer_get_init(handle, PROTOCOL_ATTRIBUTES,
> > + SCMI_PROTOCOL_VOLTAGE, 0, sizeof(*resp), &t);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + resp = t->rx.buf;
> > + ret = scmi_do_xfer(handle, t);
> > + if (!ret)
> > + vinfo->num_domains =
> > + NUM_VOLTAGE_DOMAINS(le32_to_cpu(resp->attr));
> > +
> > + scmi_xfer_put(handle, t);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline int scmi_init_voltage_levels(struct device *dev,
>
> Should remove this inline attribute.
>
Ah right, I removed one and left this. I'll do.
> > + struct scmi_voltage_info *v,
> > + u32 flags, u32 num_returned,
> > + u32 num_remaining)
[snip]
> > +DEFINE_SCMI_PROTOCOL_REGISTER_UNREGISTER(SCMI_PROTOCOL_VOLTAGE, voltage)
> > diff --git a/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h b/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
> > index 9cd312a1ff92..181fdebc2793 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
> > @@ -209,6 +209,64 @@ struct scmi_reset_ops {
> > int (*deassert)(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 domain);
> > };
> >
> > +/**
> > + * struct scmi_voltage_info - describe one available SCMI Voltage Domain
> > + *
> > + * @id: the domain ID as advertised by the platform
> > + * @segmented: defines the layout of the entries of array @levels_uv.
> > + * - when True the entries are to be interpreted as triplets,
> > + * each defining a segment representing a range of equally
> > + * space voltages: <lowest_volts>, <highest_volt>, <step_uV>
> > + * - when False the entries simply represent a single discrete
> > + * supported voltage level
> > + * @negative_volts_allowed: True if any of the entries of @levels_uv represent
> > + * a negative voltage.
> > + * @attributes: represents Voltage Domain advertised attributes
> > + * @name: name assigned to the Voltage Domain by platform
> > + * @num_levels: number of total entries in @levels_uv.
> > + * @levels_uv: array of entries describing the available voltage levels for
> > + * this domain.
> > + */
> > +struct scmi_voltage_info {
> > + unsigned int id;
> > + bool segmented;
> > +#define SCMI_VOLTAGE_SEGMENT_LOW 0
> > +#define SCMI_VOLTAGE_SEGMENT_HIGH 1
> > +#define SCMI_VOLTAGE_SEGMENT_STEP 2
>
> Maybe move these macros before 'int *level_us;' as these are indices
> in that array.
>
Right, I'll do.
Thanks
Cristian
> > + bool negative_volts_allowed;
> > + unsigned int attributes;
> > + char name[SCMI_MAX_STR_SIZE];
> > + unsigned int num_levels;
> > + int *levels_uv;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * struct scmi_voltage_ops - represents the various operations provided
> > + * by SCMI Voltage Protocol
> > + *
> > + * @num_domains_get: get the count of voltage domains provided by SCMI
> > + * @info_get: get the information of the specified domain
> > + * @config_set: set the config for the specified domain
> > + * @config_get: get the config of the specified domain
> > + * @level_set: set the voltage level for the specified domain
> > + * @level_get: get the voltage level of the specified domain
> > + */
> > +struct scmi_voltage_ops {
> > + int (*num_domains_get)(const struct scmi_handle *handle);
> > + const struct scmi_voltage_info __must_check *(*info_get)
> > + (const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 domain_id);
> > + int (*config_set)(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 domain_id,
> > + u32 config);
> > +#define SCMI_VOLTAGE_ARCH_STATE_OFF 0x0
> > +#define SCMI_VOLTAGE_ARCH_STATE_ON 0x7
> > + int (*config_get)(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 domain_id,
> > + u32 *config);
> > + int (*level_set)(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 domain_id,
> > + u32 flags, s32 volt_uV);
> > + int (*level_get)(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 domain_id,
> > + s32 *volt_uV);
> > +};
> > +
> > /**
> > * struct scmi_notify_ops - represents notifications' operations provided by
> > * SCMI core
> > @@ -262,6 +320,7 @@ struct scmi_notify_ops {
> > * @clk_ops: pointer to set of clock protocol operations
> > * @sensor_ops: pointer to set of sensor protocol operations
> > * @reset_ops: pointer to set of reset protocol operations
> > + * @voltage_ops: pointer to set of voltage protocol operations
> > * @notify_ops: pointer to set of notifications related operations
> > * @perf_priv: pointer to private data structure specific to performance
> > * protocol(for internal use only)
> > @@ -273,6 +332,8 @@ struct scmi_notify_ops {
> > * protocol(for internal use only)
> > * @reset_priv: pointer to private data structure specific to reset
> > * protocol(for internal use only)
> > + * @voltage_priv: pointer to private data structure specific to voltage
> > + * protocol(for internal use only)
> > * @notify_priv: pointer to private data structure specific to notifications
> > * (for internal use only)
> > */
> > @@ -284,6 +345,7 @@ struct scmi_handle {
> > const struct scmi_power_ops *power_ops;
> > const struct scmi_sensor_ops *sensor_ops;
> > const struct scmi_reset_ops *reset_ops;
> > + const struct scmi_voltage_ops *voltage_ops;
> > const struct scmi_notify_ops *notify_ops;
> > /* for protocol internal use */
> > void *perf_priv;
> > @@ -291,6 +353,7 @@ struct scmi_handle {
> > void *power_priv;
> > void *sensor_priv;
> > void *reset_priv;
> > + void *voltage_priv;
> > void *notify_priv;
> > void *system_priv;
> > };
> > @@ -303,6 +366,7 @@ enum scmi_std_protocol {
> > SCMI_PROTOCOL_CLOCK = 0x14,
> > SCMI_PROTOCOL_SENSOR = 0x15,
> > SCMI_PROTOCOL_RESET = 0x16,
> > + SCMI_PROTOCOL_VOLTAGE = 0x17,
> > };
> >
> > enum scmi_system_events {
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists