lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=V0apTHaemMKvRx1HWLaO9ArC2t4ohfZ7-CthFz2NiA2A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 28 Oct 2020 11:44:48 -0700
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Rakesh Pillai <pillair@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     ath10k <ath10k@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Abhishek Kumar <kuabhs@...omium.org>,
        Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ath10k: Fix the parsing error in service available event

Hi,

On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 10:01 AM Rakesh Pillai <pillair@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>
> The wmi service available event has been
> extended to contain extra 128 bit for new services
> to be indicated by firmware.
>
> Currently the presence of any optional TLVs in
> the wmi service available event leads to a parsing
> error with the below error message:
> ath10k_snoc 18800000.wifi: failed to parse svc_avail tlv: -71
>
> The wmi service available event parsing should
> not return error for the newly added optional TLV.
> Fix this parsing for service available event message.
>
> Tested-on: WCN3990 hw1.0 SNOC
>
> Fixes: cea19a6ce8bf ("ath10k: add WMI_SERVICE_AVAILABLE_EVENT support")
> Signed-off-by: Rakesh Pillai <pillair@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> Changes from v1:
> - Access service_map_ext only if this TLV was sent in service
>   available event.
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi-tlv.c | 4 +++-
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c     | 5 +++--
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h     | 1 +
>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi-tlv.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi-tlv.c
> index 932266d..7b58341 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi-tlv.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi-tlv.c
> @@ -1401,13 +1401,15 @@ static int ath10k_wmi_tlv_svc_avail_parse(struct ath10k *ar, u16 tag, u16 len,
>
>         switch (tag) {
>         case WMI_TLV_TAG_STRUCT_SERVICE_AVAILABLE_EVENT:
> +               arg->service_map_ext_valid = true;
>                 arg->service_map_ext_len = *(__le32 *)ptr;
>                 arg->service_map_ext = ptr + sizeof(__le32);
>                 return 0;
>         default:
>                 break;
>         }
> -       return -EPROTO;
> +
> +       return 0;

I notice your v2 now returns 0 for _all_ unknown tags.  v1 just had a
special case for "WMI_TLV_TAG_FIRST_ARRAY_ENUM".  I don't have enough
experience with this driver to know which is better, but this change
wasn't mentioned in the changes from v1.  I guess you had a change of
heart and decided this way was better?


>  }
>
>  static int ath10k_wmi_tlv_op_pull_svc_avail(struct ath10k *ar,
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c
> index 1fa7107..2e4b561 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c
> @@ -5751,8 +5751,9 @@ void ath10k_wmi_event_service_available(struct ath10k *ar, struct sk_buff *skb)
>                             ret);
>         }
>
> -       ath10k_wmi_map_svc_ext(ar, arg.service_map_ext, ar->wmi.svc_map,
> -                              __le32_to_cpu(arg.service_map_ext_len));
> +       if (arg.service_map_ext_valid)
> +               ath10k_wmi_map_svc_ext(ar, arg.service_map_ext, ar->wmi.svc_map,
> +                                      __le32_to_cpu(arg.service_map_ext_len));

Your new patch still requires the caller to init the
"service_map_ext_valid" to false before calling, but I guess there's
not a whole lot more we can do because we might be parsing more than
one tag.  It does seem nice that at least we now have a validity bit
instead of just relying on a non-zero length to be valid.

It might be nice to have a comment saying that it's up to us to init
"arg.service_map_ext_valid" to false before calling
ath10k_wmi_pull_svc_avail(), but I won't insist.  Maybe that's obvious
to everyone but me...


-Doug

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ