[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AM0PR04MB4947032368486CC9874C812692170@AM0PR04MB4947.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 06:05:28 +0000
From: Sherry Sun <sherry.sun@....com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: "hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>,
"vincent.whitchurch@...s.com" <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>,
"sudeep.dutt@...el.com" <sudeep.dutt@...el.com>,
"ashutosh.dixit@...el.com" <ashutosh.dixit@...el.com>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>, "kishon@...com" <kishon@...com>,
"lorenzo.pieralisi@....com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>, Andy Duan <fugang.duan@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V5 0/2] Change vring space from nomal memory to dma
coherent memory
Hi Greg,
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/2] Change vring space from nomal memory to dma
> coherent memory
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 10:03:03AM +0800, Sherry Sun wrote:
> > Changes in V5:
> > 1. Reorganize the vop_mmap function code in patch 1, which is done by
> Christoph.
> > 2. Completely remove the unnecessary code related to reassign the used
> > ring for card in patch 2.
> >
> > The original vop driver only supports dma coherent device, as it
> > allocates and maps vring by _get_free_pages and dma_map_single, but
> > not use dma_sync_single_for_cpu/device to sync the updates of
> > device_page/vring between EP and RC, which will cause memory
> > synchronization problem for device don't support hardware dma coherent.
> >
> > And allocate vrings use dma_alloc_coherent is a common way in kernel,
> > as the memory interacted between two systems should use consistent
> > memory to avoid caching effects. So here add noncoherent platform
> support for vop driver.
> > Also add some related dma changes to make sure noncoherent platform
> > works well.
> >
> > Sherry Sun (2):
> > misc: vop: change the way of allocating vrings and device page
> > misc: vop: do not allocate and reassign the used ring
> >
> > drivers/misc/mic/bus/vop_bus.h | 2 +
> > drivers/misc/mic/host/mic_boot.c | 9 ++
> > drivers/misc/mic/host/mic_main.c | 43 ++------
> > drivers/misc/mic/vop/vop_debugfs.c | 4 -
> > drivers/misc/mic/vop/vop_main.c | 70 +-----------
> > drivers/misc/mic/vop/vop_vringh.c | 166 ++++++++++-------------------
> > include/uapi/linux/mic_common.h | 9 +-
> > 7 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 218 deletions(-)
>
> Have you all seen:
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%
> 2Flore.kernel.org%2Fr%2F8c1443136563de34699d2c084df478181c205db4.16
> 03854416.git.sudeep.dutt%40intel.com&data=04%7C01%7Csherry.sun%
> 40nxp.com%7Cc19c987667434969847e08d87b0685e8%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6f
> a92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C637394615238940323%7CUnknown%7CTW
> FpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJX
> VCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=Zq%2FtHWTq%2BuIVBYXFGoeBmq0JJzYd
> 9zDyv4NVN4TpC%2FU%3D&reserved=0
>
> Looks like this code is asking to just be deleted, is that ok with you?
Yes, I saw that patch. I'm ok with it.
Best regards
Sherry
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists